Model comparison
Llama 2-70B vs Longcat Flash Chat
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-70B scores higher in 0 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 40.6 to 7.4.
Side by side
| Llama 2-70B | Longcat Flash Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meituan |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 35 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1079 | 1471 |
Reasoning Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | 1440 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 17.7% |
| DTBench | 41.6% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 64.9% | — |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | 50% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.79 | — |
| ForecastBench | 51.4 | — |
| HellaSwag | 85.3% | — |
| LAMBADA | 78.9% | — |
| PIQA | 82.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 80.2% | — |
Math Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1091 | 1442 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 3.3% | — |
| GSM8K | 69.6% | — |
Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1454 |
| GPQA Diamond | 26.3% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 88.6% | — |
| MMLU | 69.9% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 60.2% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.6% | — |
Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1045 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 995 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1090 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 1041 | 1408 |
| LMArena Japanese | 927 | 1373 |
| LMArena Korean | 964 | 1371 |
| LMArena Russian | 1083 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1143 | 1445 |
Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1071 | 1411 |
Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1062 | 1425 |
Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1115 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1075 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1088 | 1418 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-70B better than Longcat Flash Chat?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 2-70B or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?
Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-70B and Longcat Flash Chat share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.