Model comparison
Llama 2-34B vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Neither Llama 2-34B nor Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both.
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 2-34B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | — | — |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Reasoning Not comparable
Llama 2-34B: —, Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-34B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 105.2 | 113.14 |
| WinoGrande | 76.7% | 72.9% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 44.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| PIQA | 81.9% | — |
Math Not comparable
Llama 2-34B: —, Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-34B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 42.2% | 86.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 2-34B: —, Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-34B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 54.5% | 60.9% |
| MMLU | 62.6% | 68% |
| BoolQ | 83.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.2% | — |
| TriviaQA | 84.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-34B better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?
Neither Llama 2-34B nor Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-34B and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-34B has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.