Model comparison
Llama 2-34B vs Qwen Turbo
Qwen Turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#329); Llama 2-34B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Llama 2-34B | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | — | 26.8 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Reasoning Not comparable
Llama 2-34B: —, Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-34B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| BIG-Bench Hard | 44.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 104.81 | — |
| PIQA | 81.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 76.7% | — |
Math Not comparable
Llama 2-34B: —, Qwen Turbo: 14.5 (#291)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-34B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
| GSM8K | 42.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 2-34B: —, Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-34B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 54.5% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.7% | — |
| MMLU | 62.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.2% | — |
| TriviaQA | 84.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-34B better than Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#329); Llama 2-34B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-34B and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-34B has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.