Model comparison

Llama 2-13B vs Qwen3 Max

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Llama 2-13B Meta

29.6

Rank #309 Confirmed

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.7

Rank #87 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 Max leads 62.4 to 29.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 42.2% for Llama 2-13B and 82.1% for Qwen3 Max.
  • Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 2-13B and Qwen3 Max specifications
Llama 2-13BQwen3 Max
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.643.7
Released2023-07-182025-09-23
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.20
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked3233

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Max leads

Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3 Max
LMArena Coding10621456
ALE-Bench—370.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 2-13B: —, Qwen3 Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3 Max
Vending-Bench 2—71.56

Reasoning Qwen3 Max leads

Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3 Max
Chess Puzzles0%4%
LMArena Hard Prompts10511448
DTBench42.2%82.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index106.17142.38
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—30.1%
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
LMCA—28.3%
BIG-Bench Hard58.2%—
HellaSwag80.7%—
LAMBADA76.5%—
PIQA80.8%—
WinoGrande72.8%—

Math Qwen3 Max leads

Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3 Max
LMArena Math10651446
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
MATH Level 5—97.1%
GSM8K36.9%—

Knowledge Qwen3 Max leads

Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3 Max
LMArena Expert10301455
GPQA Diamond—72.6%
SimpleQA Verified—48.7%
ARC (AI2) Challenge60.3%—
BoolQ82.4%—
MMLU55.6%—
OpenBookQA57%—
TriviaQA79.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 2-13B: —, Qwen3 Max: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3 Max
ScienceQA55.8%—

Multilingual Qwen3 Max leads

Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279), Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English10241429
LMArena Chinese10011478
LMArena French10441449
LMArena German10091463
LMArena Japanese8941397
LMArena Korean9531399
LMArena Russian10551428
LMArena Spanish10871462

Instruction Following Qwen3 Max leads

Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3 Max
LMArena Instruction Following10451419

Long Context Qwen3 Max leads

Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3 Max
LMArena Longer Query10641438
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—14.5%

Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads

Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3 Max
LMArena Text10841439
LMArena Creative Writing10471402
LMArena Multi-Turn10501446

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 2-13B better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 2-13B or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and Qwen3 Max share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper