Noometry

Model comparison

Llama 2-13B vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Llama 2-13B Meta

29.6

Rank #309 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 64.3 to 29.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 42.2% for Llama 2-13B and 84% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
  • Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 2-13BQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.645.3
Released2023-07-182026-06-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked3232

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding10621473
FrontierCode—10.2%
SciCode—45.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 2-13B: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3.7 Plus
Chess Puzzles0%24%
LMArena Hard Prompts10511460
DTBench42.2%84%
Epoch Capabilities Index106.17147.37
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
CritPt—9.1%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
LMCA—37.6%
BIG-Bench Hard58.2%—
HellaSwag80.7%—
LAMBADA76.5%—
PIQA80.8%—
WinoGrande72.8%—

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Math10651466
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
GSM8K36.9%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Expert10301467
GPQA Diamond—87.9%
ARC (AI2) Challenge60.3%—
BoolQ82.4%—
MMLU55.6%—
OpenBookQA57%—
TriviaQA79.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 2-13B: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1279
LMArena Document—1444
ScienceQA55.8%—

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English10241445
LMArena Chinese10011510
LMArena French10441473
LMArena German10091471
LMArena Japanese8941413
LMArena Korean9531415
LMArena Russian10551457
LMArena Spanish10871457

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following10451440

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query10641455

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text10841455
LMArena Creative Writing10471439
LMArena Multi-Turn10501460

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 2-13B better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 2-13B or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper