Model comparison
Llama 2-13B vs Nova 2 Lite
Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 0 categories and Nova 2 Lite in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nova 2 Lite leads 53.9 to 29.8.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 2-13B | Nova 2 Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 39.7 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | 2025-12-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 64K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2 Lite leads
Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291), Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1062 | 1385 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: —, Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.1% |
Reasoning Nova 2 Lite leads
Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337), Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1051 | 1364 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 42.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 106.17 | — |
| HellaSwag | 80.7% | — |
| LAMBADA | 76.5% | — |
| PIQA | 80.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 72.8% | — |
Math Nova 2 Lite leads
Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229), Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1065 | 1359 |
| GSM8K | 36.9% | — |
Knowledge Nova 2 Lite leads
Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249), Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1030 | 1358 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.1% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.4% | — |
| MMLU | 55.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 57% | — |
| TriviaQA | 79.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: —, Nova 2 Lite: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 55.8% | — |
Multilingual Nova 2 Lite leads
Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279), Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1024 | 1337 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1001 | 1364 |
| LMArena French | 1044 | 1381 |
| LMArena German | 1009 | 1343 |
| LMArena Japanese | 894 | 1271 |
| LMArena Korean | 953 | 1284 |
| LMArena Russian | 1055 | 1343 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1087 | 1373 |
Instruction Following Nova 2 Lite leads
Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287), Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1045 | 1335 |
Long Context Nova 2 Lite leads
Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269), Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1064 | 1335 |
Writing & Preference Nova 2 Lite leads
Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289), Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1084 | 1362 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1047 | 1291 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1050 | 1338 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-13B better than Nova 2 Lite?
Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 2-13B or Nova 2 Lite better for coding?
Nova 2 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and Nova 2 Lite share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2 Lite has 19.