Model comparison
Llama 2-13B vs MiniMax M1
MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Meta
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax M1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax M1 leads 53.1 to 29.8.
Side by side
| Llama 2-13B | MiniMax M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 40.3 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | 2025-06-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.55 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax M1 leads
Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291), MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1062 | 1359 |
Reasoning MiniMax M1 leads
Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337), MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1051 | 1339 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 42.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 106.17 | — |
| HellaSwag | 80.7% | — |
| LAMBADA | 76.5% | — |
| PIQA | 80.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 72.8% | — |
Math MiniMax M1 leads
Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229), MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1065 | 1361 |
| GSM8K | 36.9% | — |
Knowledge MiniMax M1 leads
Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249), MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1030 | 1317 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.4% | — |
| MMLU | 55.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 57% | — |
| TriviaQA | 79.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: —, MiniMax M1: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 55.8% | — |
Multilingual MiniMax M1 leads
Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279), MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1024 | 1319 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1001 | 1360 |
| LMArena French | 1044 | 1370 |
| LMArena German | 1009 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 894 | 1217 |
| LMArena Korean | 953 | 1266 |
| LMArena Russian | 1055 | 1329 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1087 | 1353 |
Instruction Following MiniMax M1 leads
Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287), MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1045 | 1312 |
Long Context MiniMax M1 leads
Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269), MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1064 | 1326 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |
Writing & Preference MiniMax M1 leads
Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289), MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1084 | 1343 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1047 | 1298 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1050 | 1335 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-13B better than MiniMax M1?
MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 2-13B or MiniMax M1 better for coding?
MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and MiniMax M1 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.