Model comparison

Llama 13b vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Llama 13b Meta

24.4

Rank #348 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 1 category and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads 45.6 to 13.8.

Side by side

Llama 13b and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
Llama 13bTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderMetaAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index24.433.0
Released2023-02-242024-11-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2114

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding6831235

Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts7281220
BIG-Bench Hard37.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index100.58—
HellaSwag79.2%—
LAMBADA75.2%—
PIQA80.1%—
WinoGrande73%—

Math Llama 13b leads

Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Math8381242
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.4%
MATH Level 5—42.7%
GSM8K20.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond—46.3%
ARC (AI2) Challenge52.7%—
BoolQ78.7%—
MMLU47.7%—
OpenBookQA56.4%—
TriviaQA77.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ScienceQA43.3%—

Multilingual Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English8191236
LMArena Chinese—1249
LMArena Russian—1246

Instruction Following Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following7811233

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query—1224

Writing & Preference Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text8341256
LMArena Creative Writing7941231
LMArena Multi-Turn7531252

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 13b better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 13b or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper