Model comparison
Llama 13b vs Step 3.7 Flash
Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 40.0 to 21.4.
Side by side
| Llama 13b | Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2023-02-24 | 2026-05-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.11 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3.7 Flash leads
Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| LMArena Coding | 683 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |
Reasoning Step 3.7 Flash leads
Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.58 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |
Math Step 3.7 Flash leads
Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LMArena Math | 838 | — |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 13b better than Step 3.7 Flash?
Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 13b or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?
Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Step 3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.