Model comparison

Llama 13b vs Qwen3.5 Plus

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Llama 13b Meta

23.9

Rank #344 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

42.3

Rank #103 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 47.9 to 24.4.
  • Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 13b and Qwen3.5 Plus specifications
Llama 13bQwen3.5 Plus
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index23.942.3
Released2023-02-242026-02-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$2.40
Results tracked2115

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Coding683—
ALE-Bench—621.92

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.5 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—0.54

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.5 Plus
Epoch Capabilities Index100.09146.79
Chess Puzzles—22%
LMArena Hard Prompts728—
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—80.5%
LMCA—36.4%
BIG-Bench Hard37.9%—
HellaSwag79.2%—
LAMBADA75.2%—
PIQA80.1%—
WinoGrande73%—

Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259), Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.5 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LMArena Math838—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%
GSM8K20.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.5 Plus
GPQA Diamond—84.8%
SimpleQA Verified—25.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.7%
ARC (AI2) Challenge52.7%—
BoolQ78.7%—
MMLU47.7%—
OpenBookQA56.4%—
TriviaQA77.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.5 Plus
ScienceQA43.3%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Non-English819—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following781—

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.5 Plus
CL-bench—19.8%
CL-bench Life—12.4%

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Text834—
LMArena Creative Writing794—
LMArena Multi-Turn753—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 13b better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper