Model comparison
Llama 13b vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Llama 13b has enough public results to be ranked (#348); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both.
Side by side
| Llama 13b | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | — |
| Released | 2023-02-24 | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.58 | 113.14 |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | 73% | 72.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 20.6% | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 838 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | 60.9% |
| MMLU | 47.7% | 68% |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 13b better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?
Llama 13b has enough public results to be ranked (#348); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.