Model comparison
Llama 13b vs o1
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and o1 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o1 leads 55.6 to 13.8.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 13b | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 40.9 |
| Released | 2023-02-24 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $60 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1 leads
Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337), o1: 46.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1367 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 47.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 80.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, o1: 24.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |
Reasoning o1 leads
Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329), o1: 27.9 (#111)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1371 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.58 | 141.91 |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| DTBench | — | 74.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |
Math o1 leads
Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256), o1: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1388 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, o1: 41.5 (#110)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1361 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, o1: 34.2 (#93)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |
Multilingual o1 leads
Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297), o1: 48.6 (#142)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1358 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1394 |
| LMArena French | — | 1344 |
| LMArena German | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1345 |
Instruction Following o1 leads
Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305), o1: 74.8 (#86)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1367 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, o1: 50.3 (#9)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1378 |
Writing & Preference o1 leads
Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312), o1: 55.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1348 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1369 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 13b better than o1?
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 13b or o1 better for coding?
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and o1 share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.