Model comparison
Llama 13b vs MiniMax M1
MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Meta
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax M1 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax M1 leads 53.1 to 13.8.
Side by side
| Llama 13b | MiniMax M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 40.3 |
| Released | 2023-02-24 | 2025-06-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.55 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax M1 leads
Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337), MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1359 |
Reasoning MiniMax M1 leads
Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329), MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1339 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.58 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |
Math MiniMax M1 leads
Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256), MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1361 |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1317 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, MiniMax M1: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |
Multilingual MiniMax M1 leads
Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297), MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1319 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1360 |
| LMArena French | — | 1370 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1217 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1266 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1329 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1353 |
Instruction Following MiniMax M1 leads
Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305), MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1312 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1326 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax M1 leads
Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312), MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1343 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1298 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1335 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 13b better than MiniMax M1?
MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 13b or MiniMax M1 better for coding?
MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and MiniMax M1 share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.