Model comparison

Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Laguna M.1 Poolside

32.5

Rank #256 Reported

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Laguna M.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.2 to 21.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 0% for Laguna M.1 and 58% for Qwen3.8 Max.
  • Qwen3.8 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Laguna M.1 and Qwen3.8 Max specifications
Laguna M.1Qwen3.8 Max
ProviderPoolsideAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index32.556.8
Released2026-04-282026-08-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K1M
Max output33K131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked339

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads

Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena WebDev13491674
DeepSWE—57.5%
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%
LMArena Coding—1502

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen3.8 Max
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1496
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Surface Evolver Bench15.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.41

Math Qwen3.8 Max leads

Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283), Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen3.8 Max
ProofBench0%58%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
LMArena Math—1499

Knowledge Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen3.8 Max
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%
LMArena Expert—1507

Multimodal Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision—1314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English—1472
LMArena Chinese—1538
LMArena French—1503
LMArena German—1483
LMArena Japanese—1467
LMArena Korean—1461
LMArena Russian—1481
LMArena Spanish—1492

Instruction Following Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following—1479

Long Context Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query—1489

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text—1483
LMArena Creative Writing—1479
LMArena Multi-Turn—1489

Frequently asked questions

Is Laguna M.1 better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Laguna M.1 or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.8 Max does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Qwen3.8 Max share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper