Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5 27B
Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Laguna M.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 27B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 27B leads 38.8 to 21.1.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.5 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 41.9 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2026-02-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 33K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 28 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5 27B leads
Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204), Qwen3.5 27B: 38.9 (#168)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | 1358 |
| WeirdML | — | 39.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1427 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 349.45 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.5 27B: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 201.98 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 27B leads
Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184), Qwen3.5 27B: 27.5 (#117)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 47.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1414 |
| DTBench | — | 82.4% |
| LMCA | — | 34% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
Math Qwen3.5 27B leads
Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283), Qwen3.5 27B: 38.8 (#127)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 56.7% |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1429 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.5 27B: 38.0 (#150)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1428 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.5 27B: 39.4 (#59)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1241 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.5 27B: 50.8 (#115)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1478 |
| LMArena French | — | 1410 |
| LMArena German | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1345 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1407 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.5 27B: 73.5 (#119)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1393 |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.5 27B: 43.1 (#106)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1413 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.5 27B: 59.3 (#111)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1409 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1362 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1410 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Qwen3.5 27B?
Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or Qwen3.5 27B better for coding?
Qwen3.5 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Qwen3.5 27B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 27B has 28.