Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B
Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-30B-A3B leads 37.4 to 21.1.
- Laguna M.1 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 41K.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Qwen3-30B-A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 38.9 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2025-04-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 41K |
| Max output | 33K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.5 (#194)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
| SciCode | — | 33.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 29.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1416 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.8 (#82)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41.4% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 22.2 (#204)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1398 |
| DTBench | — | 69.3% |
| LMCA | — | 22.4% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 139.63 |
Math Qwen3-30B-A3B leads
Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.4 (#157)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 47.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 70.3% |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1394 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.8 (#105)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 70.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 12.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1396 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.5 (#132)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1372 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1433 |
| LMArena French | — | 1418 |
| LMArena German | — | 1380 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1370 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1404 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.0 (#142)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1363 |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#283)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 40.6% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1379 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.6 (#143)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1384 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1317 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 75.3% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1378 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Qwen3-30B-A3B?
Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or Qwen3-30B-A3B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (36.6 vs 37.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Laguna M.1 does, with 262K tokens against 41K.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Qwen3-30B-A3B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32.