Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
Laguna M.1 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.5 vs 33.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Laguna M.1 leads 36.6 to 22.6.
- Laguna M.1 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 33K.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 33.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 33K |
| Max output | 33K | 29K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.66 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1276 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |
Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1251 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 119.49 |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |
Math Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads
Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1251 |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1221 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1228 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1223 |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1251 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?
Laguna M.1 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.5 vs 33.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Laguna M.1 or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?
Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Laguna M.1 does, with 262K tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.