Model comparison

Laguna M.1 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Laguna M.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.9 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Laguna M.1 Poolside

31.9

Rank #252 Reported

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

31.5

Rank #259 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Laguna M.1 leads 36.4 to 32.8.
  • Laguna M.1 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Laguna M.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct specifications
Laguna M.1Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
ProviderPoolsideAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.931.5
Released2026-04-282024-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K131K
Max output33K8K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$5.60
Results tracked343

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Laguna M.1 leads

Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 32.8 (#256)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena WebDev1348—
WeirdML—16%
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.8%
LMArena Coding—1293
BigCodeBench Complete—55.9%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.0 (#124)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
TheAgentCompany—5.7%
BALROG—16.2%
METR Time Horizons—35.8%

Reasoning Too close to call

Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 21.4 (#197)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts—1271
DTBench—62.9%
LMCA—13.4%
Surface Evolver Bench15.6%—
BIG-Bench Hard—79.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—129.01
ForecastBench—57.5
HellaSwag—84.8%
PIQA—82.6%
WinoGrande—82.3%

Math Laguna M.1 leads

Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 18.1 (#281)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—8.1%
ProofBench0%—
Omni-MATH—33%
LMArena Math—1283
MATH Level 5—63.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 26.9 (#247)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
GPQA Diamond—49.1%
MMLU-Pro—63.1%
Confabulations—19.1%
GPQA (HELM)—42.6%
LMArena Expert—1245
ARC (AI2) Challenge—94.5%
MMLU—85.3%
TriviaQA—71.9%

Multilingual Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.2 (#208)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1252
LMArena Chinese—1272
LMArena French—1279
LMArena German—1234
LMArena Japanese—1180
LMArena Korean—1188
LMArena Russian—1264
LMArena Spanish—1255

Instruction Following Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.7 (#216)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
IFEval—80.6%
LMArena Instruction Following—1254

Long Context Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#183)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1282

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.9 (#210)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text—1269
LMArena Creative Writing—1221
WildBench—80.2%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1272

Frequently asked questions

Is Laguna M.1 better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Laguna M.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.9 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Laguna M.1 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better for coding?

Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Laguna M.1 does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper