Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Phi-3.5-MoE
Laguna M.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#256); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
MicrosoftSide by side
| Laguna M.1 | Phi-3.5-MoE | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | — |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2024-08-17 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| PIQA | — | 88.6% |
Math Not comparable
Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 88.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| BoolQ | — | 84.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Phi-3.5-MoE?
Laguna M.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#256); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Phi-3.5-MoE share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-MoE has 3.