Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Phi-1.5
Laguna M.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#252); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
MicrosoftSide by side
| Laguna M.1 | Phi-1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | — |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2023-09-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1348 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 90.82 |
| HellaSwag | — | 47.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73.4% |
Math Not comparable
Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 44.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 75.8% |
| MMLU | — | 37.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 37.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Phi-1.5?
Laguna M.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#252); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Phi-1.5 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Phi-1.5 has 7.