Model comparison

Laguna M.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Laguna M.1 Poolside

32.5

Rank #256 Reported

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Laguna M.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.3 in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.1 to 21.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 0% for Laguna M.1 and 58% for Muse Spark 1.3.
  • Muse Spark 1.3 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Laguna M.1 and Muse Spark 1.3 specifications
Laguna M.1Muse Spark 1.3
ProviderPoolsideMeta
Noometry Index32.554.8
Released2026-04-282026-09-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K1.05M
Max output33K131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked337

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204), Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev13491657
CursorBench—41.6%
SciCode—59.7%
LMArena Coding—1514

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Muse Spark 1.3
APEX-Agents—57.8%
GDP.pdf—27.6%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184), Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Muse Spark 1.3
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—26%
Chess Puzzles—38%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1503
Mystery Game Puzzles—25%
DTBench—96.5%
LMCA—53.9%
Surface Evolver Bench15.6%—
Bench to the Future 3—0.14
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.75

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283), Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Muse Spark 1.3
ProofBench0%58%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.2%
LMArena Math—1494

Knowledge Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Expert—1516

Multimodal Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision—1309
LMArena Document—1471

Multilingual Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Non-English—1481
LMArena Chinese—1529
LMArena French—1524
LMArena German—1515
LMArena Japanese—1474
LMArena Korean—1501
LMArena Russian—1490
LMArena Spanish—1490

Instruction Following Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Instruction Following—1477

Long Context Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Longer Query—1488

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text—1490
LMArena Creative Writing—1455
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1906
LMArena Multi-Turn—1482

Frequently asked questions

Is Laguna M.1 better than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Laguna M.1 or Muse Spark 1.3 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.3 does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Muse Spark 1.3 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.3 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper