Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Llama 3-8B
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Laguna M.1 leads 21.1 to 8.8.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Llama 3-8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 25.5 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2024-04-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 34 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204), Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 31.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1152 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 36.9% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 56.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 54.8% |
Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184), Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1133 |
| DTBench | — | 43.9% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 57.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 116.45 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.6 |
| WinoGrande | — | 75.7% |
Math Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283), Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.9% |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1151 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 6.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 26.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1113 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 82.8% |
| MMLU | — | 68.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 82.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 67.7% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1098 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1076 |
| LMArena French | — | 1159 |
| LMArena German | — | 1104 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 967 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1004 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1109 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1173 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1127 |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1128 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1150 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1152 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Llama 3-8B?
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or Llama 3-8B better for coding?
Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Llama 3-8B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.