Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Llama 3.2 3B
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama 3.2 3B leads 29.9 to 20.3.
- Laguna M.1 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.2 3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 28.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 131K |
| Max output | 33K | 118K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.33 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195), Llama 3.2 3B: 27.1 (#314)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1348 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 23.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1098 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 28.3% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3.2 3B: 19.9 (#135)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 21.9% |
| BALROG | — | 10.1% |
Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187), Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#225)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1095 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
Math Llama 3.2 3B leads
Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276), Llama 3.2 3B: 29.9 (#213)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1126 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3.2 3B: 29.1 (#232)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1090 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3.2 3B: 26.4 (#276)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1019 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1017 |
| LMArena German | — | 1056 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 949 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3.2 3B: 56.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1089 |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#256)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1101 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3.2 3B: 24.9 (#302)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1094 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 595 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1105 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Llama 3.2 3B?
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or Llama 3.2 3B better for coding?
Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 27.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Laguna M.1 does, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Llama 3.2 3B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 3B has 18.