Model comparison

Kimi K3 vs Phi-3.5-MoE

Kimi K3 has enough public results to be ranked (#15); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Phi-3.5-MoE Microsoft

—

Unranked

Side by side

Kimi K3 and Phi-3.5-MoE specifications
Kimi K3Phi-3.5-MoE
ProviderMoonshot AIMicrosoft
Noometry Index59.5—
Released2026-07-162024-08-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output1.05M—
Input $ / M tokens$3—
Output $ / M tokens$15—
Results tracked533

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Phi-3.5-MoE
DeepSWE68.5%—
FrontierCode44.2%—
LMArena WebDev1654—
FrontierSWE25.9%—
SciCode59.5%—
WeirdML82.6%—
LMArena Coding1508—
ALE-Bench1,524—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Phi-3.5-MoE
APEX-Agents50.6%—
τ²-bench Banking37.1%—
PostTrainBench32%—
GBAEval48.3%—
GDP.pdf19%—
Vending-Bench 25,165—

Reasoning Not comparable

Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Phi-3.5-MoE
ARC-AGI-260.4%—
SimpleBench60.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)93.6%—
ARC-AGI-194.5%—
CritPt23.4%—
Chess Puzzles39%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1496—
Mystery Game Puzzles26%—
DTBench91.2%—
LMCA52.7%—
Surface Evolver Bench95%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.45—
ForecastBench61.1—
PIQA—88.6%

Math Not comparable

Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Phi-3.5-MoE
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)72.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 439%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions87.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench87%—
LMArena Math1491—
GSM8K—88.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Phi-3.5-MoE
GPQA Diamond93.1%—
SimpleQA Verified50.6%—
LMArena Expert1521—
BoolQ—84.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Phi-3.5-MoE
Blueprint-Bench 229.5%—
Furniture Assembly34.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Phi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Non-English1466—
LMArena Chinese1529—
LMArena French1491—
LMArena German1488—
LMArena Japanese1487—
LMArena Korean1458—
LMArena Russian1482—
LMArena Spanish1472—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Phi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Instruction Following1483—

Long Context Not comparable

Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Phi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Longer Query1494—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Phi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Text1476—
LMArena Creative Writing1454—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2082—
EQ-Bench 41339—
LMArena Multi-Turn1488—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K3 better than Phi-3.5-MoE?

Kimi K3 has enough public results to be ranked (#15); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K3 and Phi-3.5-MoE share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K3 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-MoE has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper