Model comparison

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) vs Qwen3-1.7B

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) Moonshot AI

41.2

Rank #140 Confirmed

Qwen3-1.7B Alibaba (Qwen)

26.6

Rank #336 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 42.7 to 16.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: 59.1% for Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and 28.4% for Qwen3-1.7B.

Side by side

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Qwen3-1.7B specifications
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)Qwen3-1.7B
ProviderMoonshot AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.226.6
Released2025-07-122025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.57—
Output $ / M tokens$2.30—
Results tracked424

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.4 (#102), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Qwen3-1.7B
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)63.4%—
Aider Polyglot59.1%—
GSO4.9%—
WeirdML42.8%—
LMArena Coding1399—
ALE-Bench597.5—

Agentic & Tool Use Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.4 (#64), Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Qwen3-1.7B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard59.1%28.4%
Terminal-Bench35.7%—
METR Time Horizons59.2%—

Reasoning Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 23.3 (#179), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Qwen3-1.7B
SimpleBench26.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark64.4%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1384—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.01—
ForecastBench60.2—

Math Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.7 (#83), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Qwen3-1.7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—8.1%
Omni-MATH65.4%—
LMArena Math1397—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)21.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 37.3 (#157), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Qwen3-1.7B
GPQA Diamond—38%
MMLU-Pro81.9%—
Confabulations20.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate17.9%—
GPQA (HELM)65.3%—
LMArena Expert1365—

Multilingual Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.6 (#130), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Qwen3-1.7B
LMArena Non-English1372—
LMArena Chinese1415—
LMArena French1379—
LMArena German1387—
LMArena Japanese1349—
LMArena Korean1325—
LMArena Russian1385—
LMArena Spanish1386—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.1 (#156), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Qwen3-1.7B
IFEval85%—
LMArena Instruction Following1348—

Long Context Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#145), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Qwen3-1.7B
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—
CL-bench17.6%—
LMArena Longer Query1353—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.3 (#78), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Qwen3-1.7B
LMArena Text1380—
LMArena Creative Writing1350—
Short-Story Creative Writing85.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1666—
WildBench86.2%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1371—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Qwen3-1.7B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.

Related comparisons

Go deeper