Model comparison
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 62.3 to 23.8.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2025-07-12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.57 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.30 | — |
| Results tracked | 42 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.4 (#102), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1399 | 999 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 63.4% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 59.1% | — |
| GSO | 4.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 42.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 597.5 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.4 (#64), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 35.7% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 59.1% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 59.2% | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 23.3 (#179), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1384 | 976 |
| SimpleBench | 26.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 64.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.01 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.2 | — |
Math Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.7 (#83), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1397 | 1026 |
| Omni-MATH | 65.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 21.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 37.3 (#157), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1365 | 980 |
| MMLU-Pro | 81.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 20.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 17.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65.3% | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.6 (#130), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1415 | 1024 |
| LMArena German | 1387 | 902 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 952 |
| LMArena French | 1379 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1386 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.1 (#156), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1348 | 978 |
| IFEval | 85% | — |
Long Context Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#145), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1353 | 988 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
| CL-bench | 17.6% | — |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.3 (#78), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1380 | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | 969 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1371 | 977 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 85.6% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1666 | — |
| WildBench | 86.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.