Model comparison

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) vs Phi-2

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has enough public results to be ranked (#134); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) Moonshot AI

40.9

Rank #134 Confirmed

Phi-2 Microsoft

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.

Side by side

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Phi-2 specifications
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)Phi-2
ProviderMoonshot AIMicrosoft
Noometry Index40.9—
Released2025-07-122023-12-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.57—
Output $ / M tokens$2.30—
Results tracked4211

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 43.1 (#83), Phi-2: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Phi-2
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)63.4%—
Aider Polyglot59.1%—
GSO4.9%—
WeirdML42.8%—
LMArena Coding1399—
ALE-Bench597.5—
HumanEval+—45.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.2 (#59), Phi-2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Phi-2
Terminal-Bench35.7%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard59.1%—
METR Time Horizons59.2%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 22.7 (#173), Phi-2: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Phi-2
Epoch Capabilities Index146.02107.62
SimpleBench26.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark64.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1384—
Adversarial NLI—42.5%
BIG-Bench Hard—59.4%
ForecastBench60.2—
HellaSwag—53.6%
WinoGrande—54.7%

Math Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 40.1 (#81), Phi-2: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Phi-2
Omni-MATH65.4%—
LMArena Math1396—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)21.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 36.9 (#153), Phi-2: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Phi-2
MMLU-Pro81.9%—
Confabulations20.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate17.9%—
GPQA (HELM)65.3%—
LMArena Expert1363—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—75.9%
MMLU—58.4%
OpenBookQA—73.6%
TriviaQA—45.2%

Multilingual Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.8 (#125), Phi-2: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Phi-2
LMArena Non-English1372—
LMArena Chinese1416—
LMArena French1379—
LMArena German1386—
LMArena Japanese1349—
LMArena Korean1324—
LMArena Russian1384—
LMArena Spanish1383—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.3 (#151), Phi-2: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Phi-2
IFEval85%—
LMArena Instruction Following1347—

Long Context Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#140), Phi-2: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Phi-2
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—
CL-bench17.6%—
LMArena Longer Query1353—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.5 (#76), Phi-2: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Phi-2
LMArena Text1380—
LMArena Creative Writing1349—
Short-Story Creative Writing85.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1666—
WildBench86.2%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1371—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better than Phi-2?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has enough public results to be ranked (#134); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Phi-2 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Phi-2 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper