Model comparison
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Yi-34B
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 7.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 84.2% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and 14.7% for Yi-34B.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 27.8 |
| Released | 2025-11-06 | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1112 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1104 |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.39 |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1114 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | 14.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1061 |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1176 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 1081 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | 993 |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | 959 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1050 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | 1070 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1091 |
Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1094 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1113 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Yi-34B?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Yi-34B better for coding?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Yi-34B share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.