Model comparison
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Qwen1.5-14B
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 60.0 to 33.6.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen1.5-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2025-11-06 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1138 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75), Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1113 |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1125 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1094 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |
Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109), Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1147 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 1116 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | 1085 |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109), Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1102 |
Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1113 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Qwen1.5-14B?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Qwen1.5-14B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.