Model comparison
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Qwen-14B
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 60.0 to 27.6.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2025-11-06 | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1071 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1027 |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.03 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1068 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1031 |
Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1028 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Qwen-14B?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Qwen-14B better for coding?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Qwen-14B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.