Model comparison
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 60.0 to 25.8.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 30.3 |
| Released | 2025-11-06 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1016 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 993 |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1018 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 947 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | — |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.