Model comparison
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs o1-pro
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 29.7.
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | o1-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 31.5 |
| Released | 2025-11-06 | 2025-03-19 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $150 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $600 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75), o1-pro: 20.4 (#239)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 23.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | — |
Math Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1429 | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69), o1-pro: 29.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | — |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than o1-pro?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and o1-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.