Model comparison

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Nova 2 Lite

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo Moonshot AI

45.8

Rank #70 Confirmed

Nova 2 Lite Amazon

39.7

Rank #161 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 7 categories and Nova 2 Lite in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 47.4 to 37.5.
  • Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Nova 2 Lite specifications
Kimi K2 Thinking TurboNova 2 Lite
ProviderMoonshot AIAmazon
Noometry Index45.839.7
Released2025-11-062025-12-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—64K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked2119

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nova 2 Lite leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178), Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboNova 2 Lite
LMArena Coding14541385
LMArena WebDev1322—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —, Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboNova 2 Lite
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.1%

Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75), Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboNova 2 Lite
LMArena Hard Prompts14281364
Chess Puzzles20%—

Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68), Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboNova 2 Lite
LMArena Math14291359
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202583.1%—

Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69), Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboNova 2 Lite
LMArena Expert14391358
GPQA Diamond84.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.1%

Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109), Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboNova 2 Lite
LMArena Non-English13981337
LMArena Chinese14561364
LMArena French14251381
LMArena German13901343
LMArena Japanese13571271
LMArena Korean13301284
LMArena Russian13911343
LMArena Spanish14061373

Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109), Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboNova 2 Lite
LMArena Instruction Following14031335

Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102), Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboNova 2 Lite
LMArena Longer Query14151335

Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104), Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboNova 2 Lite
LMArena Text14151362
LMArena Creative Writing13741291
LMArena Multi-Turn14141338

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Nova 2 Lite?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Nova 2 Lite better for coding?

Nova 2 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Nova 2 Lite share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2 Lite has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper