Model comparison
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Mistral Large
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral Large in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 47.4 to 18.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 83.1% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and 8.5% for Mistral Large.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Mistral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2025-11-06 | 2024-02-26 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 51 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178), Mistral Large: 34.3 (#240)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1277 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | — |
| SciCode | — | 36.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 30% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 47.1% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.3% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 264.7 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 62.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 59.5% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —, Mistral Large: 28.6 (#89)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 38.4% |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75), Mistral Large: 15.8 (#310)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1257 |
| SimpleBench | — | 22.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 43.5% |
| DTBench | — | 65.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 50.1% |
| LMCA | — | 16.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| LiveBench | — | 48.4% |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68), Mistral Large: 18.2 (#291)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | 8.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1262 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 28.1% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 42.5% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 50.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0.3% |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69), Mistral Large: 30.1 (#230)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | 51.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1232 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 59.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 21.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 43.5% |
| MMLU | — | 80% |
Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109), Mistral Large: 40.0 (#219)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1237 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1240 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 1325 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | 1188 |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | 1202 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1257 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | 1268 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109), Mistral Large: 67.9 (#191)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1249 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 67.9% |
| IFEval | — | 87.7% |
Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102), Mistral Large: 38.3 (#199)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1261 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104), Mistral Large: 40.7 (#242)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1266 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 1243 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1260 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 69% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 985 |
| WildBench | — | 80.1% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 39.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Mistral Large?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Mistral Large better for coding?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 34.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Mistral Large share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large has 51.