Noometry

Model comparison

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Llama 2-7B

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo Moonshot AI

45.4

Rank #63 Confirmed

Llama 2-7B Meta

28.6

Rank #315 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 60.2 to 28.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 20% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and 0% for Llama 2-7B.

Side by side

Kimi K2 Thinking TurboLlama 2-7B
ProviderMoonshot AIMeta
Noometry Index45.428.6
Released2025-11-062023-07-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2129

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166), Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)

BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboLlama 2-7B
LMArena Coding14541002
LMArena WebDev1322—

Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72), Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)

BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboLlama 2-7B
Chess Puzzles20%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14281009
BIG-Bench Hard—39.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—98.54
HellaSwag—77.2%
LAMBADA—73.3%
PIQA—78.8%
WinoGrande—69.2%

Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62), Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)

BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboLlama 2-7B
LMArena Math14291042
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202583.1%—
GSM8K—16.7%

Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64), Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)

BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboLlama 2-7B
LMArena Expert14391036
GPQA Diamond84.2%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—45.9%
BoolQ—77.9%
MMLU—45.8%
OpenBookQA—58.6%
TriviaQA—73.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —, Llama 2-7B: —

BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboLlama 2-7B
ScienceQA—43.1%

Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104), Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)

BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboLlama 2-7B
LMArena Non-English1398973
LMArena Chinese1457973
LMArena French1425969
LMArena German1390978
LMArena Russian1390995
LMArena Spanish14071007
LMArena Japanese1356—
LMArena Korean1329—

Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103), Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)

BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboLlama 2-7B
LMArena Instruction Following14031006

Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99), Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)

BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboLlama 2-7B
LMArena Longer Query1415999

Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99), Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)

BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboLlama 2-7B
LMArena Text14151053
LMArena Creative Writing13731033
LMArena Multi-Turn14141029

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Llama 2-7B?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Llama 2-7B better for coding?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Llama 2-7B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper