Model comparison

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.3 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.3

Rank #94 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.9 to 38.8.
  • Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is cheaper at $0.50 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
  • Kimi K2.7 Code accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct specifications
Kimi K2.7 CodeQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ProviderMoonshot AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.343.0
Released2026-06-122025-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K131K
Max output262K33K
Input $ / M tokens$0.95$0.50
Output $ / M tokens$4$2
Results tracked1925

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
DeepSWE30.5%—
FrontierCode30.1%—
LMArena WebDev1473—
SciCode47.5%—
WeirdML54.1%—
LMArena Coding—1440
ALE-Bench886.23—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
APEX-Agents37.6%—
GBAEval0.9%—
Vending-Bench 25,083—

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
SimpleBench57.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.7%
CritPt10%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1428
Surface Evolver Bench48.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.97—

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)54%—
FrontierMath Tier 412.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%—
Omni-MATH—46.7%
LMArena Math—1440

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
GPQA Diamond87.9%—
SimpleQA Verified36.5%—
MMLU-Pro—78.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—63%
LMArena Expert—1417

Multilingual Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1407
LMArena Chinese—1460
LMArena French—1413
LMArena German—1417
LMArena Japanese—1395
LMArena Korean—1364
LMArena Russian—1404
LMArena Spanish—1435

Instruction Following Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
IFEval—81%
LMArena Instruction Following—1389

Long Context Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Fiction.LiveBench—55.6%
LMArena Longer Query—1403

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Text—1417
LMArena Creative Writing—1334
WildBench—80.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1416

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.3 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.

Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (42.9 vs 42.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2.7 Code does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper