Model comparison

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.3

Rank #94 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 37.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 54.1% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 41.2% for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper at $0.95 / $4 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.

Side by side

Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Kimi K2.7 CodeQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderMoonshot AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.338.1
Released2026-06-122025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K262K
Max output262K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.95$1.50
Output $ / M tokens$4$7.50
Results tracked1925

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena WebDev14731275
WeirdML54.1%41.2%
ALE-Bench886.23461.45
DeepSWE30.5%—
FrontierCode30.1%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
SciCode47.5%—
GSO—4.9%
LMArena Coding—1412
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Too close to call

Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
APEX-Agents37.6%—
GBAEval0.9%—
Vending-Bench 25,083—

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
SimpleBench57.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
CritPt10%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1372
Surface Evolver Bench48.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.97—

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)54%—
FrontierMath Tier 412.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%—
LMArena Math—1365

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
GPQA Diamond87.9%—
SimpleQA Verified36.5%—
LMArena Expert—1338

Multilingual Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1346
LMArena Chinese—1357
LMArena French—1398
LMArena German—1325
LMArena Japanese—1310
LMArena Korean—1305
LMArena Russian—1366
LMArena Spanish—1360

Instruction Following Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following—1355

Long Context Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1378

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text—1357
LMArena Creative Writing—1333
LMArena Multi-Turn—1365

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper. It lists at $0.95 per million input tokens and $4 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper