Model comparison
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 42.9 to 36.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierCode: 30.1% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 10.2% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.3 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2026-06-12 | 2026-06-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 262K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.95 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | 10.2% |
| SciCode | 47.5% | 45.5% |
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1473 |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122), Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 10% | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | 24% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.97 | 147.37 |
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1460 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 93.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1466 |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1467 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1510 |
| LMArena French | — | 1473 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1440 |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.
Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?
Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3.7 Plus share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.