Model comparison
Kimi K2.7 Code vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 43.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 3 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 42.2.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.3 | 48.5 |
| Released | 2026-06-12 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 262K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.95 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | 1637 |
| SciCode | 47.5% | 51.3% |
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1504 |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 10% | 12% |
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1482 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.97 | — |
Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 63% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1468 |
Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1501 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1511 |
| LMArena French | — | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1463 |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1463 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1451 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 43.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.
Is Kimi K2.7 Code or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 42.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.