Model comparison
Kimi K2.7 Code vs MiMo-V2.5
Kimi K2.7 Code and MiMo-V2.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.3 vs 43.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 3 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.9 to 36.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 10% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 3.7% for MiMo-V2.5.
- MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.3 | 43.4 |
| Released | 2026-06-12 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 262K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.95 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | 1438 |
| SciCode | 47.5% | 43.1% |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | 513.95 |
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1469 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122), MiMo-V2.5: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 10% | 3.7% |
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1450 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.97 | — |
Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1436 |
Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1460 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1468 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1416 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1434 |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1445 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than MiMo-V2.5?
Kimi K2.7 Code and MiMo-V2.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.3 vs 43.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.
Is Kimi K2.7 Code or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 42.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and MiMo-V2.5 share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.