Model comparison

Kimi K2.5 vs Molmo 2 8b

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI

48.1

Rank #57 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Molmo 2 8b in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 leads 65.1 to 49.4.

Side by side

Kimi K2.5 and Molmo 2 8b specifications
Kimi K2.5Molmo 2 8b
ProviderMoonshot AIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index48.139.1
Released2026-01-27—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.45—
Output $ / M tokens$2.25—
Results tracked515

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Kimi K2.5: 48.8 (#53), Molmo 2 8b: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Molmo 2 8b
SWE-bench Verified73.8%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)70.8%—
LMArena WebDev1437—
SWE-bench Multilingual67.3%—
SciCode49%—
WeirdML45.6%—
LMArena Coding1474—
ALE-Bench821.65—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2.5: 34.2 (#48), Molmo 2 8b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Molmo 2 8b
Terminal-Bench43.2%—
OSWorld63.3%—
Vending-Bench 21,198—

Reasoning Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 31.2 (#80), Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Hard Prompts14531287
ARC-AGI-211.8%—
SimpleBench46.8%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark78.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)69.9%—
ARC-AGI-165.3%—
CritPt3.1%—
Chess Puzzles12%—
EnigmaEval3.4%—
Thematic Generalization69.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index148.03—

Math Not comparable

Kimi K2.5: 51.8 (#53), Molmo 2 8b: —

Knowledge Not comparable

Kimi K2.5: 53.6 (#56), Molmo 2 8b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Molmo 2 8b
GPQA Diamond87.6%—
Humanity's Last Exam24.4%—
SimpleQA Verified34.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate14.2%—
LMArena Expert1466—

Multimodal Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 41.1 (#39), Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Vision12691081
LMArena Document1430—

Multilingual Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 53.9 (#53), Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Non-English14331276
LMArena Chinese1495—
LMArena French1454—
LMArena German1441—
LMArena Japanese1421—
LMArena Korean1410—
LMArena Russian1435—
LMArena Spanish1450—

Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 75.3 (#64), Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Instruction Following14311270

Long Context Not comparable

Kimi K2.5: 52.1 (#7), Molmo 2 8b: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Molmo 2 8b
Fiction.LiveBench86.1%—
CL-bench19.3%—
CL-bench Life13.2%—
LMArena Longer Query1445—

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 leads

Kimi K2.5: 65.1 (#53), Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Text14451288
LMArena Creative Writing1423—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1579—
LMArena Multi-Turn1444—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.5 better than Molmo 2 8b?

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 and Molmo 2 8b share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Molmo 2 8b has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper