Model comparison

Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.5 Instant Moonshot AI

43.6

Rank #89 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 62.4 to 39.4.
  • Kimi K2.5 Instant has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Kimi K2.5 Instant and Qwen3.7 Max specifications
Kimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Max
ProviderMoonshot AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.651.5
Released—2026-05-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1833

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Max
LMArena WebDev14041515
LMArena Coding14841498
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
SciCode—48.8%
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2.5 Instant: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts14431483
SimpleBench—70.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%
Epoch Capabilities Index—153.68

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Math14421490
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Expert14401488
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Qwen3.7 Max: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Vision1254—

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English14061474
LMArena Chinese14491530
LMArena Russian14041484
LMArena French1403—
LMArena German1413—
LMArena Korean1378—
LMArena Spanish1447—

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following14301460

Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query14351482

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text14201476
LMArena Creative Writing13811449
LMArena Multi-Turn14271481
EQ-Bench 4—1110

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 42.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Qwen3.7 Max share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper