Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Qwen3 14B
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 29.7 to 18.5.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen3 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 35.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | — |
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: —, Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |
Math Too close to call
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1442 | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1449 | — |
| LMArena French | 1403 | — |
| LMArena German | 1413 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | — |
Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Qwen3 14B?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Qwen3 14B better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Qwen3 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.