Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 39.4 to 16.2.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 30.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |
Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1442 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1449 | — |
| LMArena French | 1403 | — |
| LMArena German | 1413 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.