Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Phi-4 Mini
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 40.2 to 25.3.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 Instant | Phi-4 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 30.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.075 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | — |
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | — |
Math Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1449 | — |
| LMArena French | 1403 | — |
| LMArena German | 1413 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Phi-4 Mini?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Phi-4 Mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.