Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 60.8 to 49.2.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 Instant | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 38.1 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.3 (#95), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1318 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 28.5 (#88), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1302 |
Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 36.6 (#105), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1443 | 1315 |
Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#121), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1438 | 1272 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#47), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.2 (#89), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1403 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1413 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | 1255 |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.5 (#61), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | 1275 |
Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.8 (#82), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.8 (#91), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1379 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 1289 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.