Model comparison

Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.5 Instant Moonshot AI

43.6

Rank #89 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 9 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 40.2.
  • Kimi K2.5 Instant has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Kimi K2.5 Instant and Muse Spark specifications
Kimi K2.5 InstantMuse Spark
ProviderMoonshot AIMeta
Noometry Index43.650.6
Released—2026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1827

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMuse Spark
LMArena Coding14841481
LMArena WebDev1404—
SciCode—51.5%

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMuse Spark
LMArena Hard Prompts14431474
CritPt—11.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—152.04

Math Muse Spark leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMuse Spark
LMArena Math14421455
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMuse Spark
LMArena Expert14401457
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%

Multimodal Muse Spark leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMuse Spark
LMArena Vision12541306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMuse Spark
LMArena Non-English14061464
LMArena Chinese14491509
LMArena French14031497
LMArena German14131497
LMArena Korean13781459
LMArena Russian14041466
LMArena Spanish14471472

Instruction Following Too close to call

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMuse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following14301442

Long Context Too close to call

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMuse Spark
LMArena Longer Query14351451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMuse Spark
LMArena Text14201474
LMArena Creative Writing13811459
LMArena Multi-Turn14271477

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 42.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Muse Spark share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper