Model comparison

Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Mistral Small 3

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.5 Instant Moonshot AI

43.6

Rank #89 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #278 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral Small 3 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 60.6 to 32.2.

Side by side

Kimi K2.5 Instant and Mistral Small 3 specifications
Kimi K2.5 InstantMistral Small 3
ProviderMoonshot AIMistral AI
Noometry Index43.631.2
Released—2025-01-30
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—33K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.08
Results tracked1824

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Mistral Small 3: 36.5 (#207)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMistral Small 3
LMArena Coding14841246
LMArena WebDev1404—
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—50.4%

Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Mistral Small 3: 18.9 (#273)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMistral Small 3
LMArena Hard Prompts14431233
Chess Puzzles—0%
Epoch Capabilities Index—127.07

Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Mistral Small 3: 16.3 (#295)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMistral Small 3
LMArena Math14421240
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—6.7%

Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Mistral Small 3: 25.1 (#263)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMistral Small 3
LMArena Expert14401202
GPQA Diamond—47.3%
Confabulations—25.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Mistral Small 3: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMistral Small 3
LMArena Vision1254—

Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Mistral Small 3: 37.3 (#236)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMistral Small 3
LMArena Non-English14061198
LMArena Chinese14491204
LMArena French14031203
LMArena German14131211
LMArena Korean13781188
LMArena Russian14041216
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Spanish1447—

Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Mistral Small 3: 63.7 (#229)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMistral Small 3
LMArena Instruction Following14301214

Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#211)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMistral Small 3
LMArena Longer Query14351246

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Mistral Small 3: 32.2 (#280)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantMistral Small 3
LMArena Text14201234
LMArena Creative Writing13811195
LMArena Multi-Turn14271217
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—707

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Mistral Small 3?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Mistral Small 3 better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Mistral Small 3 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3 has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper