Model comparison

Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Longcat Flash Chat

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.5 Instant Moonshot AI

43.6

Rank #89 Confirmed

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 5 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 3 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 29.7 to 19.0.

Side by side

Kimi K2.5 Instant and Longcat Flash Chat specifications
Kimi K2.5 InstantLongcat Flash Chat
ProviderMoonshot AIMeituan
Noometry Index43.642.1
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1819

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Coding14841471
LMArena WebDev1404—

Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts14431440
Kagi LLM Benchmark—43.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—17.7%

Math Too close to call

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Math14421442

Knowledge Too close to call

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Expert14401454

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Longcat Flash Chat: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Vision1254—

Multilingual Too close to call

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Non-English14061404
LMArena Chinese14491465
LMArena French14031456
LMArena German14131408
LMArena Korean13781371
LMArena Russian14041395
LMArena Spanish14471445
LMArena Japanese—1373

Instruction Following Too close to call

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Instruction Following14301411

Long Context Too close to call

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Longer Query14351425

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Text14201427
LMArena Creative Writing13811388
LMArena Multi-Turn14271418

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Longcat Flash Chat?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (42.6 vs 43.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Longcat Flash Chat share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper