Model comparison

Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.5 Instant Moonshot AI

43.6

Rank #89 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 52.0 to 41.1.

Side by side

Kimi K2.5 Instant and Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 specifications
Kimi K2.5 InstantLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
ProviderMoonshot AINVIDIA
Noometry Index43.640.1
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1810

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 37.9 (#186)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Coding14841296
LMArena WebDev1404—

Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 26.2 (#135)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Hard Prompts14431311

Math Not comparable

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Math1442—

Knowledge Not comparable

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Expert1440—

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Vision1254—

Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 41.1 (#211)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Non-English14061253
LMArena Chinese14491277
LMArena Russian14041269
LMArena French1403—
LMArena German1413—
LMArena Korean1378—
LMArena Spanish1447—

Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 68.3 (#189)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Instruction Following14301293

Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 39.5 (#176)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Longer Query14351299

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 50.8 (#179)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Text14201308
LMArena Creative Writing13811288
LMArena Multi-Turn14271315

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper